Clinical Cases · Think before the reveal

Work the case. Defend the next step.

Turn dermatology facts into clinic-ready reasoning—one decision at a time, from the opening history through follow-up.

Your role: recognize, describe, prioritize, explain, and escalate under supervision. These cases do not authorize independent diagnosis, prescribing, procedures, discharge decisions, or emergency management.

DermPrep clinical case reasoning pathwayA patient card moves through five stages: ask, describe, narrow, test, and act with supervision.ASKDESCRIBENARROWTESTACTRECOGNIZE → DESCRIBE → REASON → COMMUNICATE
Original DermPrep reasoning map. Each step reveals only after the learner commits.
PurposePractice sequential clinical reasoning.
LevelsFoundation through resident refresher.
PrerequisitesMorphology, distribution, and focused differential.
Time5, 15, or 30 minutes per case.

Choose your depth

Every pathway reaches a useful decision.

Enter at your available time. Deeper paths add interpretation, management reasoning, and follow-up.

Ask

Prioritize history questions that change the differential.

Describe

Use location, number, lesion, color, configuration, surface, and distribution.

Reason

Rank the most likely, an important alternative, and a dangerous mimic when relevant.

Communicate

Give a concise presentation and supervised next-step recommendation.

Case discovery

Pick the skill—not just the diagnosis.

A focused launch library avoids empty categories and zebra-heavy lists.

Infectious · Rotation15 min

The expanding annular plaque

Describe an annular scaly eruption, separate common mimics, and decide what question a bedside test should answer.

  • Morphology before diagnosis
  • Focused differential
  • KOH interpretation
Work this case →
Inflammatory · Foundation8 min

Chronic extensor plaques

Use distribution, scale, nail examination, and symptoms to strengthen or weaken a psoriasis pattern.

  • What else to examine
  • No-test reasoning
  • Severity and context
Medication eruption · Intern6 min

Rash plus mucosal pain

Recognize the history and examination features that should shift the goal from naming the rash to urgent escalation.

  • Red flags
  • Medication timeline
  • Role-appropriate escalation

Clinical prioritization

Build a differential that earns every item.

Do not reward length. Reward fit, consequence, and discrimination.

Common

What diagnosis often produces this morphology in this setting?

Important

Which alternative would meaningfully change testing or management?

Dangerous

Which mimic cannot be safely missed when red flags are present?

Characteristic

Which less-common diagnosis belongs because a specific clue supports it?

What changes your mind?

Select one new finding. Then decide whether your goal remains outpatient diagnosis or shifts to urgent escalation.

Common mistakes

Correct the reasoning process—not just the answer.

Diagnosing before describing

Use morphology and distribution to create the problem representation first.

Anchoring on one clue

Ask whether the rest of the history and examination agree.

Ordering without a question

Name what uncertainty the test should resolve and how the result would change action.

Ignoring medications

Build a timeline that includes starts, stops, dose changes, and nonprescription agents.

Overstating certainty

Separate the leading diagnosis from what is proven, supported, or still uncertain.

Stopping at diagnosis

Plan response assessment, monitoring, exposure control, and when to reopen the differential.

If your attending asks

Answer with a decision and a reason.

What else would you examine?

Choose based on the case: scalp, nails, mucosa, palms and soles, genital skin, lymph nodes, or additional body sites. Explain how that finding would change the differential or urgency.

What is your focused differential?

Give the leader, one important alternative, and a dangerous mimic when relevant. State the feature that separates them.

Why this test?

State the clinical uncertainty, the information the test provides, and how a positive or negative result would alter reasoning.

When would you escalate?

Escalate promptly for toxic appearance, mucosal involvement, rapidly progressive disease, purpura with systemic symptoms, extensive blistering or detachment, suspected invasive infection, or another urgent feature—within your role and local workflow.

Rapid-fire retrieval

Try one question.

A learner sees a new generalized eruption after a medication change. Which first response demonstrates the strongest reasoning?

30-second recap

  • Ask only questions that can change the differential, urgency, or next step.
  • Describe before diagnosing.
  • Rank a focused differential and name the discriminating feature.
  • Define the diagnostic question before choosing a test.
  • Reassess when new evidence conflicts with the original story.
  • Finish with management reasoning, follow-up, and role-appropriate escalation.
Sources & page information
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About Ringworm.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical Overview of Ringworm.
  3. DermNet. Terminology in dermatology.
  4. American Academy of Dermatology. Psoriasis clinical guideline resources.
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Serious skin-reaction safety communication illustrating medication-associated red flags.
Report a factual correction